![]() C++ is a lower level language, therefore Chrlauncher is probably more efficient and the file size is obviously smaller.įor ultra weak computers/notebooks and for people who want portability, chrlauncher is definitely the way to go. It's larger because it's a C# project with essential nuget packages for UI and json deseriaization. If you like to use keyboard shortcuts then Vivaldi and later Opera could be worth a try.īookmarks are easy to export/import, every browser has a function for that - as for passwords using something like Bitwarden is the only practical way when you switch - and is much safer than using the browser anyway.But honestly, I think, it's easier to switch builds for average users and has a Material UI that follows the style of pure Chromium, also it has a detailed description about what is defferent in each Chromium build. My suggestion: browsers are free, since you are a Chrome user whatever browser you will try it will offer many more features and settings than Chrome (some people like that, some others call it bloatware: in the end if you find those features useful you love them). Unless you are a casual user - one who does not tinker at all - switching browser is a real PITA and no one can suggest you another, example: you mention Opera but you come from Chrome, Chrome has tabs groups, Opera doesn't, Opera has workspaces, personally I find workspaces way more practical than tabs groups, the key word is "personally" - everyone of us has different browsing habits and visits websites that - for whatever reason - don't work the same way in different browser (before typing this I was just going crazy with France Musique's webplayer and Opera, no issue at all in Safari or Vivaldi on that website). Ungoogled chromium if you want chrome without google, so basically a skeleton that requires some IT basics. Con is that it cannot auto update, you have to do it manually. Librewolf- a FF fork but with all privacy setting enabled so out of the box it is a solid browser without the Mozilla bloat of FF. ![]() Made for video streaming and shopping since it finds coupons for you.įF is said to be a privacy browser, but you need to tweak it a bit to achieve that. Made for a power userĮdge- the fastest and most resource friendly of any chromium based browsers to date. Integrated email, calender, insane tab management and god mode customizability. All browsers that I will mention, you can import stuff from chrome in the click of a button It all depends on how you use a browser and what do you expect. We can just reccomend for you have the final choice. You have a lot of choices you just need to choose one that sucks less for your use case. If not either Brave that has the same feel as Chrome but has more privacy toggles, Vivaldi is cool for productivity, Opera has their own thing and works similar to Chrome. One year is a long time and gives time for MV3 compliant extensions to evolve. OP if you don't have issues with Chrome and you enjoyed using it, tbh since Google postponed for another year all the MV3 stuff, you should stick with it. ![]() The browser isn't unusable by any means and it works, heck I use still use it despite hating mozilla's decisions at the whelm of FF (still has a lot of customization options despite they limiting some) it's just I think it could be much more if it had more funding, a bigger dev team and mozilla actually cared about Firefox thats it. They think that to have the market share back is to make anti-google campaigns and other marketing stunts, but imo if they would put more money into their Browser I think more people would see Firefox as a viable alternative. The fix was to reinstall and make new profile, it's just a nuisance that's all.) (Example when I updated to 105 version of Firefox it made the browser use more CPU/GPU resources than normal and would crash the nvidia driver when watching Twitch/YouTube. I feel like with each update now, something is quicker to break and you must go around tweaking settings to fix it or completely reinstall and make a new profile. I feel like the crunch on the Dev team two years ago despite what people say, did have an impact in the browser's quality and development. They get most of their revenue from Google, ads and their own products (VPN, Pocket, etc), but sometimes it feels like they use more of the money for other random crap (pushing weird agendas, questionable campaigns, CEO's high salary, etc) than the browser's own development. The problem with Firefox imo, is the mismanagement by Mozilla. Heard good things about Firefox, but I also heard that the dev team (or the higher ups?) dont really keep it up to date and possibly are trying to kill it to favour their other products?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |